Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mitchell Krueger vs Omni Kumar Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Krueger vs Kumar analysis and find out who is favored!
Mitchell Krueger vs Omni Kumar Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Krueger 1 - 0 Kumar
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Krueger has won 52.3% of points on their second serve, while Kumar has won 54.22%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Krueger, in recent form, has won 51.63% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kumar has won 58.04%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.4% and 36.71% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Krueger has saved 58.45% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kumar has saved 55.35% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Krueger has won 56.72% of matches played (W/L 38/ 29), with Kumar winning 62.86% (W/L 44/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Krueger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 115/ 90), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 8/ 14). Kumar has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 234/ 130), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 3/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Krueger has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.6% of matches (W/L 30/ 23), where as Kumar has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 73.91% of matches (W/L 34/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Krueger winning 1 times and Kumar being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Krueger winning 2 and Kumar winning 0. The last match between Krueger and Kumar was at the Indian Wells 2 Challenger, 23-01-2024, First, Hard with Mitchell Krueger getting the victory 7-6(2) 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:46:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Krueger and Kumar have played a deciding set 0 times, with Krueger winning 0 times and Kumar 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Krueger winning 1, and Kumar 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Krueger has played against opponents with an average rank of 273.58 while Kumar has played against players with an average rank of 214.24.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Krueger has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kumar has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Krueger has converted 41.18% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kumar has converted 46.18% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
251
Rank
135
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
376
Rank
348
High
22
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
53% (403-358)
Career Total W/L
63% (245-144)
62% (23-14)
YTD W/L
63% (15-9)
$697,038
Career Prize Money
$20,500
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Mitchell Krueger | Omni Kumar |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:30 | 1:46:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (43/77) | 52% (34/66) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 72% (31/43) | 62% (21/34) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (17/34) | 44% (14/32) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (4/4) | 38% (3/8) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (31/66) | 38% (29/77) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(2) 6-3 |
Stats 
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Omni Kumar
56%
(
43 of
77)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
66)
2
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mitchell Krueger | Omni Kumar |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 62% (23/14) | 63% (15/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (53/33) | 58% (32/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (469/425) | 53% (266/233) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 72% (13/5) | 62% (8/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 56% (9/7) | 64% (7/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.38 | 0.18 |
| Aces Total | 166 | 44 |
| DFs per game | 0.16 | 0.13 |
| DFs Total | 71 | 31 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:56:55 | 1:52:41 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 324.78 | 245.71 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (1828/2807) | 67% (1112/1649) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (1272/1828) | 64% (709/1112) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (512/979) | 52% (277/537) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (112/272) | 48% (80/168) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (1191/2983) | 43% (677/1582) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (22/11) | 50% (2/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 65% (13/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (23/37) | 63% (15/24) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (16/24) | 50% (3/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 42% (5/12) | 71% (5/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 91% (23/21) | 92% (13/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 9% (23/2) | 8% (13/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (14/2) | 27% (11/3) |
Mitchell Krueger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Alexis Galarneau
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Aidan Mayo
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
12
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
20 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Liam Draxl
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
60 of
100)
8
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
100)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Mitchell Krueger
51%
(
56 of
110)
1st Serve %
66%
(
79 of
119)
6
Aces
14
5
Double Faults
3
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
51 of
79)
52%
(
28 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
38 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
49 of
119)
121
Total Points Won
108
|
7-6(3) 6-7(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
Player
Mitchell Krueger
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Filip Misolic
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
6
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
4
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andres Andrade
Player
Mitchell Krueger
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
72%
(
61 of
85)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Clement Tabur
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Mitchell Krueger
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
73%
(
53 of
73)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Stefan Kozlov
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Omni Kumar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Omni Kumar
38%
(
12 of
32)
1st Serve %
76%
(
22 of
29)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
10 of
12)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
34%
(
11 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
39
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Kai Wehnelt
77%
(
73 of
95)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
96)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
10
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
99
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Patrick Zahraj
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
47%
(
43 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
81
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carlos Lopez Montagud
Player
Omni Kumar
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
81%
(
50 of
62)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Luigi Sorrentino
87%
(
52 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Lorenzo Carboni
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kirill Kivattsev
Player
Omni Kumar
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
76%
(
44 of
58)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Michele Ribecai
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
5
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(1) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Simon Beaupain
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
75%
(
33 of
44)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Kiyan Santino Kasemi
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Krueger Vs Kumar Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Mitchell Krueger
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
